Most tools give you advice and never find out whether it was any good. Protu now closes that gap from the other end.
Attach the outcome to the decision. When a decision is recorded (a board’s call, or a hire that plays out over the following months), Protu attaches what actually happened to the recommendation it made and checks it against what it expected. It doesn’t watch what happens afterwards; the result comes from the people who lived it. Each outcome that attaches to a past decision is what lets the intelligence compound rather than reset.
The right signal. Until now, the platform could see how people engaged with a recommendation. Now it can take in what actually happened, once it’s recorded: who was hired, what worked, how a decision played out. That is a fundamentally different and more honest signal to build on.
This is a foundation, not a finished loop. But it’s the moment Protu’s intelligence stops being a one-way opinion and starts being measured against reality: the groundwork for a validity story the platform can show, not just assert.