<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Protu | Reads</title><description>Ideas, research and perspectives on organisational behaviour, leadership, intelligence and the future of work.</description><link>https://protu.io/</link><language>en-gb</language><item><title>How a board reaches judgement matters as much as who sits on it</title><link>https://protu.io/reads/2026-09-strength-of-a-board/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://protu.io/reads/2026-09-strength-of-a-board/</guid><description>What makes a board strong: who sits on it, or how it reaches judgement? A board&apos;s real strength is in how it forms collective judgement together.</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Static data doesn&apos;t become dynamic just because you collect more of it</title><link>https://protu.io/reads/2026-09-run-the-model/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://protu.io/reads/2026-09-run-the-model/</guid><description>The useful questions about an organisation are about futures that haven&apos;t happened yet. Simulating a change against how people behave beats a dashboard.</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI can do the work. It can&apos;t be the team</title><link>https://protu.io/reads/2026-07-ai-and-the-team/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://protu.io/reads/2026-07-ai-and-the-team/</guid><description>AI will do more of the work. The team, the human system underneath it, is the layer that has to be read, not generated, and it matters more as AI advances.</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The hard part of AI isn&apos;t the answer. It&apos;s knowing when not to give one</title><link>https://protu.io/reads/2026-07-knowing-when-not-to-answer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://protu.io/reads/2026-07-knowing-when-not-to-answer/</guid><description>A system built to always answer reaches for one even when evidence is thin. Knowing when not to answer is what makes AI trustworthy for decisions about people.</description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The most expensive hire is the one who fits too well</title><link>https://protu.io/reads/2026-06-fits-too-well/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://protu.io/reads/2026-06-fits-too-well/</guid><description>The candidate who fits too well is often the expensive hire. A team gets stronger by becoming more complete, not more alike. How to see the gap first.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>AI reads what people say. Protu reads how they think</title><link>https://protu.io/reads/2026-06-say-versus-do/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://protu.io/reads/2026-06-say-versus-do/</guid><description>Self-description is the least reliable way to read a person. How someone reasons through a problem is the harder signal to fake, and the one worth reading.</description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>In the AI age, the org chart is fiction</title><link>https://protu.io/reads/2026-06-org-chart-fiction/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://protu.io/reads/2026-06-org-chart-fiction/</guid><description>The org chart shows who reports to whom. It can&apos;t show who connects teams or holds things together, the real structure that decides how fast you adapt.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Two people, the same score, nothing alike</title><link>https://protu.io/reads/2026-06-same-score/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://protu.io/reads/2026-06-same-score/</guid><description>Two people can score the same and be nothing alike. Fit is a property of the relationship between a person and a team, not a number you read off one.</description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The work that holds a team together rarely shows up in a review</title><link>https://protu.io/reads/2026-06-cant-afford-to-lose/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://protu.io/reads/2026-06-cant-afford-to-lose/</guid><description>Ask who a team can&apos;t afford to lose and you&apos;ll hear the obvious star. The connective work that holds a team together rarely shows up in a review.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>People don&apos;t want to be assessed. They want to be understood</title><link>https://protu.io/reads/2025-05-what-candidates-really-want/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://protu.io/reads/2025-05-what-candidates-really-want/</guid><description>Hiring rewards people who are good at interviews. What candidates want is to be understood, and a read of how they actually work serves both sides.</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The problem with putting people into types</title><link>https://protu.io/reads/2025-02-thinking-behind-the-system/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://protu.io/reads/2025-02-thinking-behind-the-system/</guid><description>A person isn&apos;t a fixed type. The same person contributes differently across teams, roles and moments, which changes what a read can tell you about them.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The job description is where hiring goes wrong</title><link>https://protu.io/reads/2025-01-redesigning-hiring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://protu.io/reads/2025-01-redesigning-hiring/</guid><description>Most hiring starts from a job description. A role isn&apos;t really defined until you understand the team it joins, which changes who you should look for.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>